Canadas F-35's
Is that government so out of touch with reality?I bet in the end Canada will either pay up or end up buying 30-40 aircraft if they want a chance of staying on...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
NewGolconda wrote: Pfcem, with local moderator mode on, you need too, at the very least acknowledge and respect the opinion of those that have been there and done that with a specific area of...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
Nightwatch2 wrote: pfcem, you still have not addressed the point that I actually made - which is the need (on occasion) for a speed advantage over the intercept target. Yes I have.
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
pfcem wrote: Nightwatch2 wrote: pfcem, you still have not addressed the point that I actually made - which is the need (on occasion) for a speed advantage over the intercept target. Yes I have.in...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
Nightwatch2 wrote: No you haven't.Yes I have. To repeat, OBVIOUSLY you want to add as much energy to your missile at launch (by going supersonic) in order to increase its Pk but you do not HAVE to....
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
utter BS. So what do you think was their published requirement? I have been responding to whether a supersonic aircraft was needed to conduct an intercept. You keep referring to missile engagement...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
Nightwatch2 wrote:utter BS. So what do you think was their published requirement?+1
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
Just a quick observation here. . .drunkensubmariner back when this started posted excerpts from the report in question in response to pfcem's comments, and pfcem's only comeback was "No you're wrong",...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
Pfcem: We've had our ups and downs over the years, but I've always respected your passion and devotion... however, I think that those qualities have gotten the better of you here. I'd be interested...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
FLW wrote:Just some observations from an "innocent bystander". Long time no see, how's life, my old friend? Will
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
Nightwatch2 wrote: utter BS. So what do you think was their published requirement? I have been responding to whether a supersonic aircraft was needed to conduct an intercept. You keep referring to...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
FLW wrote: drunkensubmariner back when this started posted excerpts from the report in question in response to pfcem's comments, and pfcem's only comeback was "No you're wrong", so drunken posted some...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
tsz52 wrote: I'd be interested in your answers to the problem actually raised, rather than the problem that you consistently misinterpreted it as.I HAVE answered the problem actually raised (you DO...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
Looks like some movement on the file. The auditing firm is supposedly coming out with a much higher number on the full lifetime cost, and the CDS has said that the F-35 is not the only aircraft that...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
Looks like the French are coming after the contract. They must perceive some reluctance on the part of the govt or CAF procurement to go with the announced winner....
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
Sounds a bit bonkers - why go get a complete number for the F35A in isolation - unless you've got a similarly derived figure, really, you're still in the dark. Yes, running an F35A fleet til 2052 will...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
Hi,Out of curiosity, would any bid from Dassault or any other company also have to be reviewed by the same auditing frm that has reviewed the F-35 bid to assure its validity? In some ways this kind...
View ArticleRe: Canadas F-35's
I'm still in "wah?" about this..I can't for the life of me see the point in what will have been a very expensive exercise.
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....